Skip to Main Content

Podcast

Podcast Ep 72 | How the Best Leaders Create Team Accountability (Part 1)

August 23, 2021

Many lead­ers want to know how to hold a team account­able. Often they will look at the peo­ple they work with and won­der why they aren’t embrac­ing accountability.

There are two key ingre­di­ents required to effec­tive­ly build team account­abil­i­ty: tools and environment.

In part one of our two-part series on this top­ic, we dig into the tools that are required to cre­ate account­abil­i­ty on your team.

EPISODE TRAN­SCRIPT

Please note that this episode was tran­scribed using an AI appli­ca­tion and may not be 100% gram­mat­i­cal­ly cor­rect – but it will still allow you to scan the episode for key content.

Brad Giles 00:13

Wel­come to the growth Whis­per­er is where every­thing that we talk about is build­ing endur­ing great com­pa­nies, com­pa­nies that you love that you want to keep com­pa­nies that mat­ter to you, that you’re liv­ing your pas­sion inside. I’m Brad Giles. And as always, today, I’m joined by Kevin Lawrence, my co host, Kevin, how are you doing today? My friend?

Kevin Lawrence 00:38

Doing great. I’m always feel like I’m doing great. Just my sec­ond time record­ing my new home stu­dio here. And I got half the stuff work­ing. I’ll get the oth­er half work­ing over the next cou­ple weeks. I’m just sit­ting here mak­ing some adjust­ments. Yeah, real­ly good. Look­ing for­ward to the show. I love this con­ver­sa­tion on account­abil­i­ty. It’s quite con­tro­ver­sial­ly a no bread. Not a lot of peo­ple love doing it yet. It’s very effec­tive. I think it sep­a­rates the best man­agers for some of the weak­est ones, in terms of how they’re able to do it. So I’m real­ly excit­ed to dig into this today.

Brad Giles 01:11

Mm hmm. Awe­some. That’s our top­ic. This is Episode One of two how the best lead­ers hold peo­ple account­able. But before we start that, as always, what’s your word or phrase of the day?

Kevin Lawrence 01:23

Yeah, my word today is grate­ful. I’m just grate­ful for all the tools we have at our dis­pos­al. Yeah, we’re just think­ing what even the basic tech­nol­o­gy that we haven’t been able to record zoom. And, you know, you and I doing this vir­tu­al­ly, you know, we haven’t seen each oth­er in a cou­ple years now. Inter­est­ing­ly, yeah. And yet we’re doing great work togeth­er. so grate­ful for the that we get to col­lab­o­rate and do this. And I’m grate­ful that tech­nol­o­gy enables it. So yeah, I’ll be my word. Today, I’m feel­ing pret­ty grateful.

Brad Giles 01:51

Awe­some. I’ve got a phrase, what you say build on in prepa­ra­tion for this one, Uncle Kevin. You can’t be a great leader. If you’re a tech­ni­cal expert, instead, you need to coach. So what am I talk­ing about there? What I’m say­ing is that some peo­ple are tech­ni­cal experts. And they think that’s the way to man­age instead, they need to tran­si­tion to becom­ing more of a coach to help the peo­ple that report­ed him to be to be high per­form­ers or to be account­able, and to achieve great results

Kevin Lawrence 02:30

are shift­ing from tech­ni­cal experts or coach for the right people?

Brad Giles 02:33

Yep, yeah, yeah, many lead­ers get stuck think­ing they need to be the tech­ni­cal expert. Where­as in In fact, what we’re try­ing to encour­age is that they them­selves become more of a coach, I help the peo­ple to succeed.

Kevin Lawrence 02:47

Yes, the tech­ni­cal exper­tise actu­al­ly can get in the way of lead­ing peo­ple at some point, because you know the answer, you give the answer, and you approach it very dif­fer­ent­ly than a coach, or a leader by the I like the idea of shift­ing into coach Awe­some. Well, let’s dig into this thing around account­abil­i­ty today, in today’s show is how the best lead­ers hold peo­ple account­able. And this is part one of two, we’ll have anoth­er one next week as well.

03:12

And, you know, in your mind, Brad, what do you think to you? What is accountability?

Kevin Lawrence 03:20

What is it like? How would you define it? It’s a

Brad Giles 03:24

count­abil­i­ty is, I guess, one per­son, not a group, but one per­son who has own­er­ship over some­thing, and deliv­ers on their com­mit­ments. So account­abil­i­ty ver­sus respon­si­bil­i­ty, many peo­ple can be respon­si­ble for some­thing but only one per­son can be account­able for some­thing. So it’s a per­son who we can count on to deliv­er what they say they’re going to do, or what is expected.

Kevin Lawrence 03:59

Think­ing back in the old­en days when peo­ple use hors­es and car­riages to deliv­er goods. And it was like at the end, it was the count­ing on what was deliv­ered. The deliv­ery per­son would deliv­er 48 crates of canned goods, and then they would count on that and they would count it so being able to count on what the per­son­’s lib­er­ty or account­abil­i­ty. There’s anoth­er inter­est­ing mod­el for account­abil­i­ty in a book called the AWS prin­ci­ple, oh Zed as the Wiz­ard of Oz. And they basi­cal­ly have a mod­els called see it on it, solve it do it is above the line, or below the line, you ignore stuff and you make excus­es. above the line, you see some­thing and you take account­abil­i­ty to make it hap­pen for mak­ing it hap­pen. And that’s the kind of over­all account­abil­i­ty that’s not nec­es­sar­i­ly project focus, but it’s basi­cal­ly tak­ing charge and you know, it’s it’s, um, it’s like a piece of trash on the ground. It’s not in some any­one’s job descrip­tion to pick it up. But an account­able per­son would either pick it up, or get some­one to pick it up, they see it, and then they take charge of it. So it’s a, it’s an inter­est­ing mod­el for a deep­er view on account­abil­i­ty and help­ing to cre­ate a cul­ture of account­abil­i­ty, which we’ll be talk­ing about in Episode Two more. That mod­el real­ly, real­ly helps. But in for these terms, it’s, we’re talk­ing about hold­ing peo­ple account­able or hold­ing them to account. And what this episode is about is this we’re real­ly talk­ing about there’s ele­ments required to cre­ate account­abil­i­ty. And what hap­pens for most peo­ple, is they don’t have enough ele­ments yet. So if it was that ship­ment of canned goods, on the old horse and car­riage, it just says, you know, it’s like the ship, the ship­ment just is we’re gonna send you some canned goods por­tal, we’re gonna send you some stuff. When in real­i­ty, it’s eight cas­es of canned goods. And these are Roma toma­toes from Italy. And they’re 48 ounce cans. Right? Well, you have all those things that you under­stand. And by the way, it’ll be deliv­ered by what­ev­er day. And it’s, it’s eas­i­er to count when you know what the heck you’re sup­posed to count ver­sus con­cep­tu­al. So well, we got to dig into there’s no the key ele­ments required to cre­ate a cal­en­dar. And there are spe­cif­ic things that most lead­ers Miss on. And that’s what we’re going to dig into.

Brad Giles 06:32

Yeah, so this week, we’re talk­ing about the ele­ments that are required to cre­ate account­abil­i­ty. And the next week, we’re going to talk about build­ing the envi­ron­ment that account­abil­i­ty, so you need the ele­ments, and then you need the envi­ron­ment to get the account­abil­i­ty results that you’re look­ing for. So I guess we’ve got a say­ing in Aus­tralia, which is the fish rots from the head down, okay. And apply­ing that as a metaphor to a lead­er­ship team, like the leader, the CEO, or who­ev­er it is, needs to be an exam­ple of best prac­tice when it comes to account­abil­i­ty. You can’t hide behind a veil and expect every­one else to not hide behind the veil lay­er, you need to be account­abil­i­ty, you need to be account­able part of me.

Kevin Lawrence 07:22

Yes. Yeah, and some CEOs don’t like that, and some won’t start it them­selves. And so they’re not a great exam­ple. And that’s not the best way. And we all know, Brad, you and I, both we have, you know, many, many CEOs that work with us one on one, to help them get clear on their goals, and to be account­able to help them to achieve those, which is a great thing to do. It’s hard to do your­self, I mean, you and I are account­able to each oth­er on things, I’ve got a coach that I’m account­able to on my goals, or aren’t account­able to them. Yeah. And it’s, it’s very easy to let your own stuff slip. And if you’re not achiev­ing the things you set out to achieve, you’re set­ting a bad exam­ple. So basi­cal­ly, start by look­ing in the mir­ror, and look at what you need to do for your­self. That’s the that’s the key

Brad Giles 08:04

point. And that’s so inter­est­ing, you know, so often you and I have the good for­tune to meet with CEOs, who can often times many of them might say some­thing like, Look, what I’m look­ing for is some­one to hold me account­able. That’s why I want to get a coach, I want some­one to hold me account­able. And we can’t stand over them and yell at them every time they don’t do the things that they’re, they say that

Kevin Lawrence 08:37

we could, but that would­n’t be what we’d want to do and not good use of their time. And it’s not effec­tive. It’s it does­n’t work. They because they would even­tu­al­ly tell us to bug­ger off exact­ly as your peo­ple do. But some­times they don’t tell you to bug­ger off. And then they just bug­ger off them­selves and either don’t do work­er or they leave it’s Yeah, you know, account­abil­i­ty is not yelling and scream­ing at peo­ple. The most advanced account­abil­i­ty, and that’s what a lot of the tools that we’ll share with you is the most advanced account­abil­i­ty. Peo­ple set their own goals which you agree to, if they man­age them­selves and track their progress on a dai­ly and week­ly basis. And then they report on how they did. He asked the most advanced account­abil­i­ty, and then they give them­selves a report card of how they did and how they can do bet­ter next time. That’s how you grow lead­ers. And it’s the most advanced ver­sions and you don’t even have to say a lot, but and that it gets more into the envi­ron­ment about next week. But in order to do

Brad Giles 09:36

that, you got to have the right tools. The ele­ments, which is what we’re talk­ing about today is begin with your­self, you know that you’ve got to find a way to use this, these tools and this envi­ron­ment you’ve got to cre­ate the cul­ture of account­abil­i­ty and even to a degree peer account­abil­i­ty. So real­ly first then is the clear goal. So it’s got to be, it’s got to be clear in what we’re going to be try­ing to achieve. And so this was actu­al­ly last week’s episode around smart, Spe­cif­ic, Mea­sur­able, Achiev­able, Rel­e­vant and time based goals. So refer back to Episode 71, if you want to learn more about that, but the first is that you’ve got to be clear on the pri­or­i­ties or goals of the com­pa­ny and the indi­vid­ual in their depart­ment. And also things like the KPIs or the tar­gets for a depart­ment. So work­ing in and on the busi­ness, you’ve got to be very spe­cif­ic around, you could have a bud­get you could have, you could have sim­ply sales goals, and sell all dif­fer­ent ways to be very clear on what you’re try­ing to achieve. That is a part of the foun­da­tion of account­abil­i­ty. Because if you don’t have clar­i­ty on what you’re try­ing to achieve, very specif­i­cal­ly, it’s going to be very, very hard to do any of the oth­er things. Yeah.

Kevin Lawrence 11:10

So we kind of break that down into those clear goals. No projects are things that they’re going to deliv­er on. And then sec­ond­ly, clear met­rics, mea­sures, num­bers, yeah. And then we look at those num­bers. And we have lots of dif­fer­ent phras­es that we use, but that’s just basi­cal­ly mea­sur­ing how well you you or your team are per­form­ing. And, and, you know, oper­a­tional­ly these would, if we’re take sales, it would be, you know, num­ber of cold calls that were made num­ber of meet­ings that were held num­ber of refer­rals that were received, no kind of lights, all the activ­i­ty stuff. And if this is things like in pro­duc­tion, it’s going to be num­ber of wid­gets pro­duced per hour, the error rate, the over­time rate, you know, and any safe­ty inci­dents, the the the labor cost per wid­get, or per hour, and the mate­r­i­al cost and the mate­r­i­al waste, and all kinds of oper­a­tional stuff that just tells you how we’re run­ning it. And how healthy a part of the busi­ness is. So when you kind of have those two things, goals or projects to advance a move ahead, and you call that on the busi­ness, and then the oper­a­tional met­rics to tell you how you’re per­form­ing, to kind of mea­sure the, you know, the, in the busi­ness, those two things, they set you up pret­ty well. And that sounds kind of like a basic, and you would think every­one has this and they don’t, not to the point where you should be able to real­ly sit down so okay. Show me your show. Show me your score­card that tells us that you’re doing a great or tells you you’re doing a great job. And whether it’s this week or this month, this quar­ter. Yeah, and an aver­age per­son should pull out some­where between two and, you know, six or eight num­bers that mea­sure those oper­a­tional met­rics or, you know, some call them KPIs. But KPIs has about three dif­fer­ent meet­ings. So oper­a­tional met­rics, and then it should have a list of goals. And if they if every­one in your team has that, like con­grat­u­la­tions. That’s basi­cal­ly the gold stan­dard for man­ag­ing a team. Every­one’s got clear goals, smart goals, and every­one’s got those num­bers that indi­cate the their depart­ment or their role that they’re doing a good job.

Brad Giles 13:25

That is an inter­est­ing state­ment, one of the real­ly sim­ple ques­tions around Have you estab­lished this foun­da­tion of account­abil­i­ty is, Does every body in the orga­ni­za­tion know whether they’ve had a good day or week? Does every­one in the orga­ni­za­tion know whether they’ve had a good day or week now not just because, you know, they enjoyed the sports that they watched, but in their role? Yes, they know. And if they don’t, well, there is the oppor­tu­ni­ty to work on to begin to build an envi­ron­ment or one of the ele­ments that cre­ate the envi­ron­ment of accountability.

Kevin Lawrence 14:05

Right and, and sports teams, most sports have this, right, they have things like they know, the prac­tices you need to be at and you know, the drills that you need to run and the times you need to get or the past suc­cess that you need to get we have a lot of that stuff. And some­times we just kind of expect peo­ple to show up and work hard and make it hap­pen. And we don’t often set them up to win here with us. And again, every­thing I look at account­abil­i­ty, the high­est form of account­abil­i­ty is self account­abil­i­ty. So every­thing we look at is try­ing to get peo­ple to be able to self man­age, and then the man­ag­er gets involved as need­ed. So I always think about it from the shoes of the per­son doing the work ver­sus you know, big broth­er. So back­ing up. So we’ve got clear goals, check see last week’s episode, and then clear met­rics or KPIs that indi­cate per­for­mance in their role and how they’re doing the on an ongo­ing basis. The next one is the behav­ior Expect expec­ta­tions. And at the end of the day, you know, how you show up and how you treat peo­ple and work with peo­ple is pret­ty impor­tant. And, you know, there might be expec­ta­tions around, you know, behav­ior about show­ing up on time, there might be expec­ta­tions should­n’t have to be about weath­er, it could be around swear­ing, it could be about, you know, pos­i­tiv­i­ty, or neg­a­tiv­i­ty or com­plain­ing or gos­sip­ing, it could be around all kinds of things. Most of the com­pa­nies we work with set real­ly clear core val­ues that are tan­gi­ble behav­iors, not a list of what makes a nice per­son. But it’s expec­ta­tions of Well, here’s, here’s how we work togeth­er. And here’s what we do. And here’s what we won’t accept. And so that we’ve set very clear expec­ta­tions, so peo­ple can tell whether they’re con­sis­tent with it or not,

Brad Giles 15:59

let’s go back to your sports anal­o­gy before if you turned up late to prac­tice, or if you missed prac­tice, yes, there would be a con­se­quence, and you would be very, you would under­stand very well, when you join that team, every time we turn up to at this time to prac­tice and you must be here, or else you might get cut from the team. And so that clar­i­ty around behav­ioral expec­ta­tions equal­ly, you know, it could be the way that you deal with a mete­or if it’s a famous team, or it could be us what to do and what not to do. So trans­lat­ing that into a com­pa­ny, under­stand­ing the behav­ioral expec­ta­tions, as well as hav­ing clear met­rics and KPIs. And as well as hav­ing clear goals that are mea­sur­able. This is the ele­ments that build a foun­da­tion of account­abil­i­ty. If you don’t have behav­ioral expec­ta­tions that are very clear, it’s very, very hard to hold peo­ple account­able to them.

Kevin Lawrence 17:03

Yeah. And it’s hard for them to know what’s okay and what’s not. Okay. And that’s the piece that in most com­pa­nies, it’s all way too squishy, the goals are squishy, the num­bers may or may not being tracked or not enough of the right ones. And when it comes to behav­iors, in some cas­es, almost any­thing goes and what ends up hap­pen­ing is the senior lead­ers don’t like it because it becomes a lot of work to man­age. There’s a lot of chaos. Yeah. And then sec­ond­ly, the peo­ple them­selves don’t like it, because it’s, it’s this is a lot of weird stuff hap­pen­ing and fin­ger point­ing. And so what we often go into com­pa­nies, we these are, these aren’t rock­et sci­ence. But these are the basic things that we start by straight­en­ing out. Yeah. And it starts to make a big dif­fer­ence. And some peo­ple rise up, some peo­ple fall on our face, and some peo­ple are great. And then or the end, they stay great, all kinds of things hap­pen. But you’re putting, you’re tak­ing it from a more chaot­ic envi­ron­ment to some­thing that’s clear and tan­gi­ble. And we just see how it rolls in gen­er­al­ly, lots of things go in the right direc­tion. And from a leader, a leader or CEO per­spec­tive, they feel much more in con­trol of it. Because they’re just not let­ting that you know, basi­cal­ly not let­ting the chil­dren run wild in house.

Brad Giles 18:15

And then on to car­rots and sticks. You must have clar­i­ty about con­se­quences and rewards. One of the real­ly inter­est­ing ques­tions that I’ve asked many, many lead­er­ship teams about a role is why should we fire that per­son? And, and peo­ple shuf­fle around in their seats, and peo­ple kind of look out the win­dow and peo­ple are a lit­tle bit uncom­fort­able. But what why we should be super, super, super clear on why is it that we should fire insert any role sales man­ag­er? They excuse me, if they only achieve 40% of their bud­get? For three years, should we fire them? Okay, what about 60%? What about 80%? Like, we want to be super clear on where is the point at which we let them go? And where is the point at which we go up and give them a big hug.

Kevin Lawrence 19:13

And even when you so it’s impor­tant to know at some point what’s not going to be okay. And what hap­pens in a lot of com­pa­nies that get kind of get mediocre and slip into what we call the mediocre mid­dle. For a lot of them, what ends up hap­pen­ing is that they start to tol­er­ate these things. Yeah. And they don’t do that. And by the way, why don’t peo­ple deal with under­per­form­ers and peo­ple that need to be man­aged more tight­ly and then poten­tial­ly let go?

Brad Giles 19:40

I would say there’s two rea­sons because exact­ly what we’re talk­ing about here, we’re not clear or be if we are clear. I don’t like doing it.

Kevin Lawrence 19:49

Yes. So I was talk­ing with a friend girl for din­ner last night and talk­ing with them. I knew her friend and she was talk­ing about this in her com­pa­ny and she took over a new team In that team, there was some­one that is her right hand and was tox­ic beyond tox­ic. her pre­de­ces­sor had­n’t dealt with this tox­ic per­son and the pre­de­ces­sor before that had­n’t dealt with this tox­ic per­son. And they basi­cal­ly said, Well, well, why did you do it? Why were you able to get the per­son out? And no one else did she said, because I did the work. And she goes, and it was a lot of work. It was because they had, they had a strong HR depart­ment, there was a lot of poli­cies and a lot of things that had to get done a lot of paper­work, writ­ing the per­son up, uncom­fort­able con­ver­sa­tions, etc, etc, etc. And the thing is, peo­ple cringed, she said that peo­ple would say that, they would want to come in and come into her office after this indi­vid­ual had left. Like, they did­n’t even want to come into that part of the busi­ness until a per­son was gone, because they were so tox­ic. But the point is, it’s a lot of work. And it’s not fun. It’s kind of like shov­el­ing the manure out of the barn. It’s, it’s, it’s not plea­sur­able for most peo­ple yet. It’s got to be done. And that’s, that’s why a lot of peo­ple won’t deal with it. Nev­er­mind the fact that it’s, it’s the con­ver­sa­tions them­selves can be excruciating.

Brad Giles 21:11

But that’s, like I said, I think I’ve said to you before, that’s when you’ve got to as a man­ag­er, you’ve got to use the stick as a third ele­ment. Like, I’m not the stick, it’s the result. That’s the stick. I like you, Kevin. But we’ve agreed that you’re going to achieve 100 wid­gets. And, and you don’t, and you’ve cur­rent­ly done 40. Cor­rect, like,

Kevin Lawrence 21:38

I call it that the basi­cal­ly, they you set them, you set up an envi­ron­ment where they either win by them­selves with your sup­port, or they fire them­selves. Yeah, so we had an exec­u­tive that I’d worked with for about five years, he had a new man­ag­er who want­ed to fire him, and I and I, I was a lit­tle attached to this guy, I real­ly liked them, work for them shoul­der to shoul­der for a long time. And I just said, Hey, if you’re gonna, if you’re gonna fire this guy, we got to make sure we do the process, right? Because there was no doc­u­men­ta­tion, noth­ing was being done, right. And because of the role I had in this par­tic­u­lar firm, I demand­ed it, and the CEO sup­port we got it. So I sat in a meet­ing with this exec­u­tive and the per­son. And there was no, no clear goals. Every­thing was mushy. So I said, Look, I said to his man­ag­er, I said, you can’t fire him, because you’re say­ing he does­n’t achieve his goals. But it’s not it’s not clear enough. I said, between you tight­en this up to exact­ly what the per­son will achieve in the next 90 days. We find this out. We had anoth­er meet­ing, we set out they lit­er­al­ly exact­ly super smart goals for the next 90 days, what 90 days come around, we’re sit­ting face to face again. And I was for a num­ber of rea­sons I was help­ing to sort the sit­u­a­tion out. And we sat there. And I talked to the man­ag­er before­hand. He’s like, Yeah, he did­n’t even get close at all. I said, Okay, inter­est­ing opin­ion. So in the meet­ing, we went through the goals and went through them one by one, and what per­cent­age and at the end of the day, he had achieved about 40% of what he need­ed to do. So I was able to look at him and say, Hey, you real­ize you prob­a­bly did­n’t earn the oppor­tu­ni­ty to keep your job? He’s like, Yeah, I know. So it was­n’t nice, but it was clean. Because crys­tal clear goals. It was­n’t I don’t like you. You did­n’t, you got the he had the oppor­tu­ni­ty to set your goals and to pro­duce and you did­n’t pro­duce. So they gave him anoth­er 30 days. But then he had to go, which was sad. I did­n’t I but he was­n’t able to pro­duce and I did­n’t trust the exec­u­tive 100%. That’s why I went through the process. But that’s what it’s about. And it was a very pro­fes­sion­al conversation.

Brad Giles 23:47

I want to I love that I want to talk about very quick­ly a chap called Ron sage. He’s a CEO of a com­pa­ny called Pan­era Bread you may have heard of, if you’re North Amer­i­can based, not so much in Aus­tralia, very, very suc­cess­ful. They’ve got about 3000 loca­tions. So this is his per­spec­tive on this par­tic­u­lar sub­ject. He says I did­n’t under­stand that a leader can’t put up with employ­ees baloney. If some­one isn’t pro­duc­ing a leader has a right and an oblig­a­tion to fire them. Even­tu­al­ly, I learned that ser­vant lead­er­ship isn’t about being nice at all costs. It’s about being help­ful at all costs. A leader should be as bru­tal­ly hon­est as pos­si­ble. And you can do this in a kind and lov­ing way. let the chips fall where they may. And remem­ber hon­esty is help­ful. When you tell some­one why they’re doing a bad job. You’re trans­fer­ring the respon­si­bil­i­ty. Maybe they improve, maybe they leave what­ev­er the out­come, they own it. I just love that per­spec­tive. And it’s so rel­e­vant. Great com­ments. Yeah, when it comes to these ele­ments that we’re talk­ing about here, like we set the frame­work and the envi­ron­ment and the ele­ments there. We’re talk­ing about, and then we trans­fer the respon­si­bil­i­ty on to the indi­vid­ual. And then we coach them, we coach them to suc­ceed, but they own the outcome.

Kevin Lawrence 25:11

Yes, and the onus of per­for­mance and report­ing per­for­mance sits on their shoul­ders, we’re here to help facil­i­tate them clar­i­fy­ing what they need to achieve. trou­bleshoot­ing things along the way. But the but the pres­sure to per­form stays with them.

Brad Giles 25:28

And then let’s move on to the last one, which is transparent.

Kevin Lawrence 25:30

But let’s not for­get, let’s not for­get the car­rot. That’s the stick. But the car­rot is cel­e­brat­ed and acknowl­edg­ing suc­cess. Right? You need tools for recog­ni­tion and acknowl­edge­ment, and dif­fer­ent peo­ple thrive on dif­fer­ent things. Now work with some­one that real­ly thrives on recog­ni­tion. So when they do some­thing amaz­ing, I make sure it’s rec­og­nized in front of lots of oth­er peo­ple. Yeah, some oth­ers don’t like that so much, but what is the car­rot? What is the reward or the pos­i­tive rein­force­ment? You know, some­times it can be applause. Some­times it can be, you know, just lit­er­al­ly get­ting rec­og­nized or ask­ing them how they did it. But what is the pos­i­tive rein­force­ment for doing well, and, and think­ing, think­ing about that part of the sys­tem? And it could be a finan­cial incen­tive. You know, finan­cial incen­tives can kind of get messy, some­times very eas­i­ly. But what is pos­i­tive reinforcement?

Brad Giles 26:30

Some­times, many peo­ple will do amaz­ing and remark­able things and will achieve amaz­ing out­comes. Only know­ing that the leader will say, Kevin, like you did a real­ly good job there. Thank you. So very much like that, that sim­ple sen­tence can trans­form peo­ple’s input and what they achieve,

Kevin Lawrence 26:55

again, and some peo­ple need to be all that, but that’s a whole, you know, every­one, know­ing your peo­ple, what is it, they need, what gets the best out of them, every­one’s got a slight­ly dif­fer­ent thing. And know­ing that real­ly helps, so go on, Brad, you want to know more you want­ed to cov­er? Go ahead.

Brad Giles 27:10

Okay, so let’s get on to the last one trans­par­ent report­ing, one source of truth to see the results. So So you said before, it’s about the man­ag­er hold­ing the per­son account­able, or the indi­vid­ual self hold­ing some­one account­able. But I push back and say to you, there is anoth­er high­er lev­el, a high­er wis­dom, if you like a high­er lev­el. And that is pure account­abil­i­ty. So if we can cre­ate an envi­ron­ment where every­one knows what every­one has to achieve, and those peo­ple both sup­port and hold one anoth­er account­able in that envi­ron­ment, beyond the man­ag­er, like that’s the gold stan­dard that is amaz­ing to achieve.

Kevin Lawrence 27:56

It is and that’s part of the envi­ron­men­tal, I’ll make a note of that. We’ll talk about that new environment.

Brad Giles 28:01

Yeah. So we want peo­ple to know what oth­ers need to achieve. Because if you think about the whole orga­ni­za­tion, as let’s say, a series of cogs or ele­ments, we want to know if mar­ket­ing isn’t per­form­ing their job, that’s going to have a flow on effect, to sales, to oper­a­tions, to count­ing, all of those things are going to real­ly mat­ter. So we want it to be trans­par­ent. So we know when some­one isn’t per­form­ing, so that oth­er team mem­bers can sup­port them, if needed.

Kevin Lawrence 28:30

And it just cre­ates an envi­ron­ment of open­ness ver­sus not hav­ing a lit­tle secrets. And no, I’m actu­al­ly a big believ­er in 316 being trans­par­ent. Yeah, or at least peo­ple com­ing on a tight team. It can be trans­par­ent, the full report­ing. But even on a min­i­mum lev­el, com­ing back to say­ing here’s what the strengths weren’t, here’s what I need to work on. Yeah. So the idea here, and real­ly kind of the essence

28:55

of account­abil­i­ty is there’s a bunch of basic tools to have if things

Kevin Lawrence 29:03

were to be used or not things ele­ment ele­ments, ele­ments, basic ele­ments to have in place to make account­abil­i­ty hap­pen. If you don’t have them, it’s kind of hard. Oth­er­wise, you got to resort to yelling and scream­ing and kick­ing and punch­ing. And that’s hor­ri­ble. So the ele­ments we’ve talked about, real­ly are start­ing with your­self and mak­ing sure you are lead­ing by exam­ple and are account­able to the goals that mat­ter most to you. And obvi­ous­ly the ones that relate to the com­pa­ny. And then from there, clear goals, the projects that you’re going to achieve on a reg­u­lar basis things you’re going to move ahead. As we talked about last episode, clear met­rics, the num­bers that indi­cate you and your team are oper­at­ing well. behav­ioral expec­ta­tions are you know the expec­ta­tions of how we con­duct our­selves and how we treat oth­er peo­ple and work with oth­er peo­ple and work with our clients. And then car­rots and sticks to con­se­quence. As rewards, you know, when good things hap­pen, what hap­pens? And how do we rein­force the good stuff. And then when things aren’t achieved, this is what sep­a­rates, you know, the seri­ous, high­ly effec­tive lead­ers from the mediocre is, you know, mak­ing sure the con­se­quences are real, mak­ing sure the ten­sion is felt, or in some cas­es that they lose oppor­tu­ni­ties, respon­si­bil­i­ties, or even their employ­ment. And then trans­paren­cy just to hav­ing an all trans­par­ent one makes it eas­i­er to man­age. But then it grits that lever­age of that peer pres­sure or that pure accountability.

Brad Giles 30:36

Awe­some

Kevin Lawrence 30:37

What kind of Final Thoughts would you add onto this, Brad, any kind of your over­all things you’d say?

Brad Giles 30:42

account­abil­i­ty is com­plex. And many lead­ers think I want to buy a piece of soft­ware that I can plug in, and every­thing will work and now and then, once I start pay­ing it, it’ll, it’ll all be just like a mag­i­cal machine that spits out $100 bills where every­one will be account­able, but you need the ele­ments. And you need the envi­ron­ment to cre­ate the account­abil­i­ty. And it’s not hard, you just got to have the right mind­set and I go back to what age sort of mak­ing something.

Kevin Lawrence 31:14

Okay, so awe­some. Thanks for lis­ten­ing. This has been anoth­er episode of the growth whis­pers with Brad and Kevin on Kevin. He’s Brad for the video ver­sion, go to youtube​.com and just look up the growth whis­pers for Brad evo­lu­tion part­ners com​.au and for Kevin Lawrence and co​.com. Keep think­ing about account­abil­i­ty and maybe how you can take it up a bit of a notch with your your­self and your team. Have a great week and hope you join us next week as well. Have a good one.


Lawrence & Co’s work focuses on sustainable and enhanced growth for you and your business. Our diverse and experienced group of advisors can help your leaders and executive teams stay competitive through the use of various learning tools including workshops, webinars, executive retreats, or one-to-one coaching.

We help high-achieving leaders to have it all – a great business and a rewarding life. Contact us for simple and impactful advice. No BS. No fluff.