Skip to Main Content

Podcast

Podcast Ep 80 | How to Retain Your Top Talent

October 18, 2021

With a war for tal­ent being expe­ri­enced world­wide at the moment, employ­ers are not only find­ing it hard to find new peo­ple, it can also be very chal­leng­ing to retain your exist­ing people.

This week Kevin and Brad dig deep into this chal­leng­ing issue, and cov­er 7 key steps you can take to give you the best chance of retain­ing your A‑players.

EPISODE TRAN­SCRIPT

Please note that this episode was tran­scribed using an AI appli­ca­tion and may not be 100% gram­mat­i­cal­ly cor­rect – but it will still allow you to scan the episode for key content.

Brad Giles 00:13

Wel­come to the growth whis­pers where every­thing that we talk about is build­ing endur­ing great com­pa­nies, not short com­pa­nies that last all com­pa­nies that last a short time, not com­pa­nies that are mediocre, not com­pa­nies that peo­ple are in love with endur­ing great com­pa­nies. Today, as always, I’m joined by my co host, Kevin Lawrence, Kevin. Hel­lo, and how are you doing today?

Kevin Lawrence 00:36

I’m doing great, Brad. Look­ing for­ward to record­ing an episode we haven’t record­ed over the last cou­ple of weeks. So it’s nice to be back at it and have a chance for you and it reconnect

Brad Giles 00:46

Indeed. Yes, we have had a cou­ple of weeks, we actu­al­ly had a bit of a hol­i­day or went up to a place called Dar­win, which you may know from some­thing called the movie with Paul Hogan called Croc­o­dile Dundee. So in the Dar­win riv­er the most amaz­ing step from that the in the Dar­win by around the city. Last year, they took 343 croc­o­diles mean eat­ing croc­o­diles out of the bay, just last year.

Kevin Lawrence 01:18

Wow. Did you run? Did you do any croc­o­dile wrestling while you were there?

Brad Giles 01:24

No. Peo­ple don’t often sur­vive that. And so No, no, we saw quite a few of them. But def­i­nite­ly, def­i­nite­ly do not want to be involved in crop at home lis­ten­ing. Yeah, so as always, we like to talk about a word of the day. So Kevin, tell me what is your word of the day or phrase,

Kevin Lawrence 01:44

my mind is recov­ery. And, you know, it’s very inter­est­ing that I’ve had, it’s been very, very busy the first part of the sea­son since the sum­mer or since our sum­mer, you know, Sep­tem­ber going into Octo­ber, and it’s been incred­i­bly busy, but a very, very busy time. And I’m just in that peri­od where I’m kind of catch­ing my breath. You know, I kind of think of myself in the work we do. Like, like, I’m an elite ath­lete. I’m not an either elite ath­lete, like I’m not a marathon run­ner or some­thing. But that we work real­ly in Sprint­’s we work real­ly hard dur­ing peri­ods of time. And then we get a recov­ery peri­od. So fol­low­ing my own advice from my book, your oxy­gen mask, first, know my resilience rit­u­als and a bit of a recov­ery peri­od over the next cou­ple of weeks still work­ing, but just not as intense­ly. So recov­ery time is is is my theme or my word of today.

Brad Giles 02:35

Awe­some, awe­some. You, mine is reset, not too dis­sim­i­lar. Because I have had a few days Well, a week and a half off. So yeah, it’s good to reset. And, you know, every­body needs to do that. We know that glob­al­ly, in the busi­ness world, this chal­lenges around men­tal health at the moment because of the pan­dem­ic. So it’s real­ly just around reset, and the good that it can do. So we all have that. What are we talk­ing about today?

Kevin Lawrence 03:05

Or we’re mak­ing sure that we don’t have to recov­er for reset­ting too many key peo­ple in key posi­tions. Like, oh, we have that one togeth­er, right? That’s mag­ic. It was mag­ic off the cuff. But basi­cal­ly, we’re talk­ing about how do you make sure you retain your key peo­ple, and don’t have to go through the pain of replac­ing them, and reset­ting the whole process in your com­pa­ny. And that’s, that’s not fun. You know, it’s some­thing that we’ve been talk­ing about with a lot of CEOs and execs over the last while there’s this talk about the greater res­ig­na­tion. You know, and, you know, it kind of reminds me of y2k, when there was all this hype about all the com­put­ers in the world are going to shut down and I don’t know whether it’s true or not, I know there’s peo­ple that held on to their jobs dur­ing COVID that might be think­ing about mov­ing now. And it might be some deferred move­ment. But whether there is oth­er isn’t, who knows. I don’t want to play into you know, Face­book news and, and hype. But what we know is it’s a tight job mar­ket no mat­ter what, yes. And replac­ing peo­ple no mat­ter what is as chal­leng­ing as it gets. Yeah. Or we’re aware of that it gets. And so the oth­er piece that you know, they’re real­ly pas­sion­ate about is you’ll los­ing an A play­er or a high per­form­ing employ­ee is a is the cinnabar sins is one of the worst things that can hap­pen as a man­ag­er, los­ing your great peo­ple, espe­cial­ly if you weren’t aware of it, or proac­tive­ly doing things to help it so yeah, today we’re talk­ing about retain­ing your top tal­ent. Yeah,

Brad Giles 04:43

look, absolute­ly. It makes for a great head­line that peo­ple might click to talk about that kind of res­ig­na­tion stuff. But the real­i­ty is, is that this skills short­ages is a real chal­lenge for every­body around the world. And that means that Com­peti­tors or peo­ple who want to hire peo­ple may want to pay more or offer more or do dif­fer­ent things. So yeah, it is yes, for that rea­son alone, it’s an impor­tant sub­ject for us to talk about. So yeah, today we’re talk­ing about how to retain your top tal­ent, what you can, here’s

Kevin Lawrence 05:19

some of the things that we’re hear­ing around the world and like your­self, I work with peo­ple around the world in Aus­tralia, and India and Mid­dle East and US and Cana­da and oth­er Asia. And the same thing we’re hear­ing we’re hear­ing peo­ple offer­ing high­er wages, we’re hear­ing about, you know, sign­ing bonus­es or things like that, we’re hear­ing about more active recruit­ment, I don’t know if it actu­al­ly is more active, but, you know, more active recruit­ment, and there’s just a lot of talk about it, and we’re hear­ing that this mar­ket, the rent, it could be tight for quite a while. Before, it’s, you know, so it’s, it’s always hard, it just seems to be a lit­tle bit hard­er. So now we’re real­ly want­i­ng to stay with their atten­tion, just in case, you don’t believe how impor­tant you know, it is, you know, from just an income state­ment point of view, nev­er­mind a knowl­edge loss or stuff, you know, the costs of replac­ing keep you it’s expen­sive, yeah, you don’t want when you’re when you do the ener­gy to get, find, recruit the right per­son. And, and, and, and make sure you do prop­er select­ing, when we, when we use top grad­ing with most of our clients all the time, you know, and the ener­gy and the time and the orga­ni­za­tion­al ener­gy and then get­ting them on board and every­thing else, it’s a lot. And if you look at the cal­cu­la­tors of what it cost to replace some­one, you know, it can be astro­nom­i­cal, much more than you would nor­mal­ly think off the top of your head,

Brad Giles 06:48

oh, and look at what real­ly is in this, there’s two dif­fer­ent parts to the cost. The first is the direct cost. And then there’s the kind of all inclu­sive cost. And so the direct costs could be just sim­ply the cost to hire, it could be, oh, we need to put an ad out or we need to pay a recruiter. But then there’s this the full the ful­ly includ­ed cost. And that’s what the real kind of the real cost is, and obvi­ous­ly sig­nif­i­cant­ly high­er. And like you, you know, I’m an advo­cate for top grad­ing and the huge body of evi­dence that that has been cre­at­ed there around that. And, and they’re say­ing that depend­ing on the role, it kind of goes from one to 1.5 times the per­son­’s salary up to 15 times the per­son­’s salary for an executive.

Kevin Lawrence 07:44

And you see, some­times when you have the wrong per­son, the cost, the actu­al dol­lar cost of the errors, or some­times it’s a fraud, some­times it’s los­ing oth­er good peo­ple. And then you see the pos­i­tive impact of the right per­son. Yeah, and now they reduce costs, and they retain good peo­ple and make bet­ter deci­sions. So the swing is mas­sive, I have seen exam­ples where we can count $10 mil­lion, for the wrong per­son in a roll eas­i­ly. It’s hard­er to count the upside when they improve it unless they’re maybe a CEO, but what­ev­er it is, it’s mas­sive. And that, you know, we just don’t want to com­mit that car­di­nal sin of los­ing your absolute best peo­ple. So you know, if you haven’t had time to think of what you’re not sure, and I know this is prob­a­bly preach­ing to the choir, as we would call it. It’s mas­sive­ly expen­sive. And if you want to watch me in meet­ings get fired up. When I hear that play­ers have left, I want to know what’s going on. Right? I even have my team or my client will hire some­one on my team to go do the exit inter­view. Because I want the truth. I don’t want what they’re going to tell HR because some­times HR can get the old goods. Yeah, some­times they’re afraid to tell some­one in the com­pa­ny the full good, I want to know, because if we’re going to just a burned, los­ing a good per­son, and some­where between a cou­ple 100 and a cou­ple, a cou­ple 100 grand and a cou­ple mil­lion dol­lars, I want to get our mon­ey’s worth from it. So let’s, we’re try­ing to pre­vent you from that painful expe­ri­ence and in the work that we do have spent a lot of time and ener­gy on retain­ing key peo­ple in com­pa­nies. And it’s not that hard. You just got to put the time and ener­gy into it. And that is our first point today. You have to put the same time and ener­gy to retain­ing your top peo­ple as you do is to retain­ing the rev­enue of your top cus­tomers. We have account man­age­ment sys­tems and things that we do to to keep our top cus­tomers hap­py and do to expand the busi­ness or keep the busi­ness or keep the com­pe­ti­tion out of the busi­ness. We don’t do that with peo­ple almost every­where. Even HR depart­ments are so busy hir­ing and mak­ing sure every­one’s doing their damn per­for­mance. reviews and deal­ing with employ­ees employ­ee prob­lems, that they often don’t have the time to do it, they’re there, they’re not anoth­er would­n’t want to, they just don’t have the time or the ener­gy to. So we’ve got to make sure that the orga­ni­za­tion is ded­i­cat­ing the ener­gy to retain­ing and keep­ing our employ­ees engaged.

Brad Giles 10:17

Yeah. Because the cost of los­ing an A play­er employ­er a, it could be, it could be if you can’t replace them, if they’re dif­fi­cult to replace, it could be so much more than a key account. We look at key accounts as if it’s every­thing, but in actu­al fact, when you look at the p&l, and you think about the impact that the top per­former could have, yeah, it’s, it’s absolute­ly worth the effort to put in to try to retain these peo­ple. So So are you putting any effort into the actu­al reten­tion rel­a­tive to sales, or at all effect?

Kevin Lawrence 10:59

And that’s you the CEO, or the exec­u­tive or the man­ag­er, not you, the head of HR, head of HR HR per­son as well, but you the actu­al man­ag­er of those peo­ple? Or have your peo­ples peo­ple, you know, like, like, yeah, so so once you’ve com­mit­ted that, you’re going to put the time and ener­gy into it, we got a whole bunch of good ideas that we have seen, that will make a difference

Brad Giles 11:27

a cou­ple of months ago. So there are a cou­ple of months ago, I had an own­er of a busi­ness call me up because his CEO had resigned, and he went to work for or he tak­en a job with a com­peti­tor, but was still work­ing out his time. And he said, I don’t know what to do. And this per­son was clear­ly an AI play­er. He was you know, run­ning the busi­ness, essen­tial­ly by him­self. And he says I don’t want to do it’s going to be so hard to find some­one like it’s going to dam­age the cul­ture and all of that and I said, Well, have you tried to get him back? Have you tried to keep the per­son and he said yeah, I tried real­ly, real­ly hard? And I said, Well, what have you done? Oh, look, I spoke to him for like sev­er­al hours and the guy paid him he would­n’t tell me exact­ly how much but it was, you know, a shock­ing amount of mon­ey and I was like, Okay, I said so what’s going to be the cost to this busi­ness and it’s not about only the mon­ey and you and I’ve spo­ken about this before they don’t peo­ple don’t leave for mon­ey but their lead­ers think that they do and so I said well how about this? What about if you go back and say look, I’ve thought about it and you’re such a valu­able per­son to this orga­ni­za­tion. And just give him a blank con­tract like a phys­i­cal paper blank con­tract, and just say, I want you to fill in the blanks with what you need to stay here and con­tin­ue to per­form in the way that you are. And that the phys­i­cal­i­ty of that doc­u­ment made a huge dif­fer­ence in the mind­set of that per­son. And even though this per­son had he’d signed anoth­er con­tract and he did­n’t want to go back in His Word with this oth­er com­pa­ny he did he turned around he put in there what he want­ed and he stayed and now this guy because it’s been a few months is actu­al­ly per­form­ing bet­ter than he has before is felt hon­ored and

Kevin Lawrence 13:21

impor­tant to that stuff. Yeah, the only thing I would say about that sto­ry is two things. One, they were deal­ing with it way too late to that’s a very dan­ger­ous strat­e­gy because then word gets out and you got a line­up of peo­ple at your door ask­ing for 30 or 40 grand more so it does work to save but there’s a down­side of it that you can get your­self in some com­pa­nies have poli­cies that once a per­son they will not bid up to keep and instead they put the ener­gy ear­ly in the process because you can cre­ate a big prob­lem even though I under­stand it you can cre­ate a big prob­lem of every­one in the word get­ting out you just have to quit and then then they’ll give you more money

Brad Giles 14:06

but and you are cor­rect them but still try still like think about what else he can do Don’t try

Kevin Lawrence 14:14

and try ide­al­ly to do it with­out cash yes unless their salary was way off mar­ket and every­thing else because then you start cre­at­ing the word that peo­ple will like some of my clients if that hap­pens they’re like thank you and you’re out because it’s they don’t want to cre­ate that cul­ture Have you got a you know, bend us over a bar­rel to get more mon­ey to stay? Yeah, for sure. And it does work because they tried so ide­al­ly you do it lat­er and some­times if it’s an absolute crit­i­cal role, some­times you might not have a choice. Yeah. And you just got to do what you do at least for a short peri­od of time. So we talked about the same ener­gy. The sec­ond thing is about real­ly know your peo­ple and know what’s going on which would tie into ear­li­er in the process. Pow­er things Going with their work, how are things going with their life and their wife or their hus­band and their kids like, no, a good leader will be very close to their peo­ple and know where they’re at. So they can help them nav­i­gate the stress­es out­side of work as well as inside work. And if you real­ly know where your peo­ple are at in their life, and what’s going on with their work, and help­ing them to find ways through it, you know, you can, you can know, you will know in advance the things that are dri­ving them crazy. And as we know, from, you know, the book, sev­en hid­den rea­sons employ­ees leave and that was back in what episode was that? Brad,

Brad Giles 15:35

I think I was 56.

Kevin Lawrence 15:39

Sev­en hid­den rea­sons employ­ee leave, and they talk about the Yo, mo 88% of man­agers are rough­ly 80 to 90% of man­agers believe employ­ees leave for more mon­ey. The truth is, from the exit inter­views, that only about 11 or 12%, lead for more mon­ey. And in many of those cas­es, there were oth­er fac­tors beyond mon­ey that made them want to leave. And they’re all most­ly emo­tion­al fac­tors. And lead­er­ship is man­ag­ing peo­ple’s emo­tions and find­ing a way to make things work for them. And if you know your peo­ple and know where they’re at, you have a much bet­ter chance of doing it.

Brad Giles 16:17

And that, I mean, that sim­ply means con­nect­ing with them look­ing for sub­tle cues that are occur­ring, find­ing the oppor­tu­ni­ty through meet­ings, you know, to touch base, and it could be as sim­ple as we’re gonna do a one word open­er for our dai­ly hud­dle, or our week­ly meet­ing or what­ev­er, lit­tle things like that. And then the one word, there are lit­tle flags and sig­nals that you can pick up on that can give you the oppor­tu­ni­ty to dig deep­er. Yeah,

Kevin Lawrence 16:47

and we’ll do a check in on a scale of zero to 10. Some­times we do it in in terms of work self and life split­ting it out for the dif­fer­ent areas. Yeah, some com­pa­nies, we talk about what’s going well at work for your­self and in life and what’s not like, just, you know, know­ing peo­ple, then you have the best posi­tion to know where they’re at and what they need. The that’s the third is an actu­al for­mal process called state inter­views. Right, instead of an exit inter­view, do that after they’ve quit, do a stay inter­view to pre­vent them from quit­ting. Yeah. And it’s just real­ly, Hey, how’s it going? Here? You know, how you feel­ing about your role? How you feel­ing about work­ing with me, your man­ag­er? You know, what’s your enjoy­ment of your role? What can we do to make this bet­ter for you? So how old are you need? You need a new print­er? Good.

Brad Giles 17:45

How’s that dif­fer­ent to a per­for­mance review?

Kevin Lawrence 17:49

It’s the oth­er way around. You’re doing a review of the orga­ni­za­tion and your­self and how you’re doing and how you, you know, how they’re feel­ing about it. It’s like, how are we doing at serv­ing your needs? ver­sus talk­ing about how you’re serv­ing the orga­ni­za­tion needs? Yeah, it’s the oth­er side of the coin. Yeah, yeah, the point of it, and most man­agers are so busy deal­ing with man­ag­ing work, they don’t take time for the peo­ple. That’s why HR depart­ments have to man­date per­for­mance reviews, and hunt peo­ple down and beat them with the stick to get it done. Because man­agers are busy. Yeah, and or they don’t pri­or­i­tize tak­ing care of their peo­ple, what­ev­er it is, we’re not here to judge that. It’s just con­scious­ly tak­ing the time to basi­cal­ly deeply under­stand their lev­el of engage­ment, and what’s going to help them to to be able to thrive in their work, and you’ll always find stuff.

Brad Giles 18:45

And that, you know, we’ve spo­ken before about the man­ag­er as a coach, the impor­tance of hav­ing the per­spec­tive that a man­ag­er isn’t there just to man­age the work as you just said, in actu­al fact, the man­ag­er is there to coach the peo­ple is their pri­ma­ry role. And coach­ing is about ask­ing the right ques­tions. So if you’re ask­ing the right ques­tions, are you going to know your peo­ple and be it’s going to help through these stay inter­views, situations?

Kevin Lawrence 19:11

Yeah, I used to do with one of my clients, I did a lot of coach­ing of their exec­u­tives of the whole exec­u­tive team. Every sin­gle one was crit­i­cal to the busi­ness, very hard to recruit, you know, high impact roles. And dur­ing the peri­od that because no one left, peo­ple were think­ing about it, but because because because we could iden­ti­fy their frus­tra­tions, many ways. My coach­ing con­ver­sa­tions had an ele­ment of a state con­ver­sa­tion in it. Yeah. And when there were frus­tra­tions, I would work with them to get them resolved, whether it was with a co work­er, a sup­pli­er or the CEO. And then we would have a plan at the end of it of what we were going to do in some of these peo­ple. I would make sure I talked to them every month, pure­ly to keep them engaged and help them deal with it was it was a lit­tle A lot of stuff going on in this com­pa­ny, we have anoth­er sit­u­a­tion where one of my team did it where they coached a dozen or 15 peo­ple, I think, because the, the VP run­ning a huge divi­sion of the com­pa­ny that he was try­ing to turn around, and that divi­sion was messy for a lot of rea­sons. He was let go. And so now they had a very crit­i­cal part of the busi­ness that was just try­ing to get its feet under it, and just come togeth­er as a team, and now their leader was gone, and oth­er exec­u­tives step­ping in, but we knew that was a big Val­ley to bridge. And so one of our team mem­bers who had been work­ing with that team on some stuff, coached every sin­gle one of them week­ly for 12 weeks. Yep. And then went down to every two weeks and went down to every once a month, as as a bridge for reten­tion. And again, last nobody. And again, if you know if you’re going to go and invest 100 grand in, in, in reten­tion, it real­ly, it’s incred­i­bly good val­ue, com­pared to the cost of los­ing just one of those peo­ple replac­ing just one of those peo­ple is in the hun­dreds of 1000s of dol­lars of cost to the busi­ness. Yeah, poten­tial­ly. And to spend a bunch of mon­ey with a coach who already had a rela­tion­ship to real­ly help them through these chal­leng­ing times. Because that’s why peo­ple leave they lose hope. And they lose faith that things are pos­si­ble and good coach­ing and, and stay inter­views can help them along the way.

Brad Giles 21:36

Indeed, indeed. And so mov­ing on to the next one, career paths, belief and pride in their career path. So where are you at in terms of your career as an employ­ee? Where a you hop­ing to go? And how does that align with the ambi­tions of the busi­ness? One of the real­ly inter­est­ing eval­u­a­tions that I’ve done with lead­er­ship teams is draw­ing an S curve in draw­ing an S curve. So you’ve, you know what an S curve looks like. And then plot­ting an indi­vid­ual against that S curve, know­ing that peo­ple don’t real­ly know too much at the bot­tom, and they achieved mas­tery at the top. But in terms of their engage­ment through the mid­dle, that’s the sweet spot. And what we want to do is to have indi­vid­u­als spend as much time as pos­si­ble in that sweet spot. Because when you achieve mas­tery, it’s fan­tas­tic. But there can be a lit­tle bit of com­pla­cen­cy, and their engage­ment can kind of drop back. So yes, being able to think where are the peo­ple in terms of their engage­ment and their career path?

Kevin Lawrence 22:51

Yeah, and one of the ways that we often keep a play­ers engaged, is mak­ing sure they have their next chal­lenges. Yeah. Now, whether it’s a chal­leng­ing project, or chang­ing of the role chal­lenges real­ly crit­i­cal for some of these peo­ple, and who would think give the peo­ple more real­ly tough work, and they’ll be hap­pi­er. But for some peo­ple, that’s the case, it’s, it’s, again, these things aren’t rock­et sci­ence, you got to put the time to and again, career path as part of that, whether it’s pro­mo­tion, types of projects, maybe it’s a new loca­tion, maybe they changed parts of the busi­ness, it does­n’t mat­ter, just, you know, keep­ing peo­ple so that they feel belief and engage­ment and where they’re going.

Brad Giles 23:35

Yeah, and there was years and years ago, I worked with a con­struc­tion com­pa­ny and they had a say­ing that the best way to keep your project man­agers who were real­ly the glue in the busi­ness was to keep them busy. So as you say, as soon as they’re not busy, they start think­ing about oth­er jobs, when they’ve got a big job to do, or they’ve got a series of big jobs to work on. They’re engaged, and they’re kind of hap­py for that. Yep.

Kevin Lawrence 24:05

Per­fect. The next thing you can do, again, assum­ing you’re gonna put the ener­gy into this, and I rec­om­mend most you know, get all of your man­agers should be putting ener­gy into this nor­mal­ly, but you know, up the ante now is just look to remove the frus­tra­tions and the fric­tions in the sys­tem. Again, it’s not rock­et sci­ence. But one of the things that dri­ve peo­ple crazy. If the cof­fee is no good, replace it, if peo­ple are com­plain­ing, because, you know, I don’t know that they have to pay for the cof­fee. And if it’s cost­ing a $500 a year to pay for the cof­fee, who cares now, if it’s $50,000, maybe it’s some­thing dif­fer­ent. You know, if peo­ple are com­plain­ing about the air con­di­tion­ing, or which in many facil­i­ties, whether it’s indus­tri­al facil­i­ties or offices, the heat­ing and air con­di­tion­ing seems to be a big point of con­tention for peo­ple. You Do what you can to fix it or buy peo­ple portable space heaters if they’re too. Too cold. You know, if peo­ple are com­plain­ing about some­thing with the com­put­er sys­tems, what can you do to help fix it, maybe it’s train­ing, maybe it’s a sys­tem, maybe it’s their com­put­er. But when peo­ple have frus­tra­tions with the basics of doing their jobs, in many ways, they feel dis­re­spect­ed. Some­times as well, when they have those frus­tra­tions, it’s oppor­tu­ni­ties for mas­sive amounts of waste. But try­ing to lis­ten to those peo­ple. That’s why we do sur­veys, reg­u­lar­i­ty, ask­ing peo­ple about the things that are dri­ving them crazy that we should stop or the bru­tal facts that we should address. Or maybe it’s just that tox­ic jerk you have in the com­pa­ny who dri­ves every­thing cool, every­one crazy.

Brad Giles 25:45

Two of the three exam­ples you got there were about com­pa­ny perks, the cof­fee, or the air con­di­tion­ing, let’s say. But in my expe­ri­ence, I’ve done a lot of these par­tic­u­lar inter­views, ask­ing teams, what pre­vents you doing your job bet­ter. And almost all of the time, it’s things that reduce com­pa­ny effi­cien­cy. Almost all of the time, it’s sys­tems or process­es that are not work­ing as they should, or teen

Kevin Lawrence 26:19

sig­na­tures, bureau­crat­ic, super slow to long, what­ev­er it hap­pens to rework

Brad Giles 26:24

all of that kind of stuff. So the irony is, is that by focus­ing a lit­tle bit of time in here to remove their frus­tra­tions, you actu­al­ly improve the effi­cien­cy and effec­tive­ness of the busi­ness significantly.

Kevin Lawrence 26:37

Yep. And, and, and some­times it’s stuff where peo­ple often just need edu­ca­tion, like some­times process­es. The process as it’s defined is good. But the way that peo­ple are doing it isn’t Yeah, and then some­times it can be but it’s, again, we’re so busy run­ning the as his busi­ness that we don’t deal with some of these things that dri­ves peo­ple crazy. Num­ber six is some­thing your Brad you talk about in your book made to thrive, but the ambas­sador role. We also talk about it in Episode 66, I believe, yes. But it’s basi­cal­ly reselling and reset­ting the vision, and ensur­ing peo­ple are still proud of the com­pa­ny and the prod­uct. Now, one of our com­pa­nies that want we inter­est­ing, I’ve done quite a few vision resets for com­pa­nies, we had our retreat and Whistler recent­ly, and we were work­ing on ours as a firm as well. And now that we have 10 peo­ple in the core team is born. I know it’s even more impor­tant. But you know, anoth­er com­pa­ny worked with the neu­ron 25 years, and the divi­sions there. But it’s kind of got­ten a lit­tle blah. And they got a real bring life back into it. Because the com­pa­ny is a great com­pa­ny. Yeah, but you got to remind peo­ple about the great­ness and some­times you got to do a few things to spice up or, or bright­en up the great­ness so that peo­ple can get recon­nect­ed and re excit­ed about it again. Yeah, that’s why restau­rants do ren­o­va­tions, why brands come up with new logos and iden­ti­ties and slo­gans to keep it fresh and relevant?

Brad Giles 28:13

Yeah, then what do peo­ple have to be proud about? Or have to be proud about in your firm? Not your firm, Kevin, but in the lis­ten­ers firm? Are they proud of their prod­uct? Are they proud of their man­ag­er? Are they proud of the team? And what’s work­ing against that because, you know, if you work for a cig­a­rette man­u­fac­tur­er, let’s say your poor may not be as proud of the firm as they could be. And that’s going to be work­ing against, you know, the reten­tion efforts with­in the busi­ness. Now, that’s an extreme exam­ple, clear­ly an unusu­al exam­ple. But when you scale it back to think about, what is it that your firm does that makes peo­ple proud? Or could make peo­ple proud? And what is it that you aren’t doing to make peo­ple proud? Some of those things can actu­al­ly real­ly neg­a­tive­ly impact your reten­tion efforts in oth­er areas.

Kevin Lawrence 29:11

Yeah, 100%. Yeah, it’s not these things are not rock­et sci­ence. We just got to keep the ener­gy in it. And the final thing is to keep the cul­ture and fun­nel live, right? And again, espe­cial­ly dur­ing COVID, a lot of com­pa­nies being vir­tu­al or dis­persed or not togeth­er as much. No, it’s easy. I mean, vir­tu­al meet­ings are incred­i­bly effi­cient. No two ways. If you run if you know how to run them. Our vir­tu­al strap plan­ning ses­sions are more effec­tive than the in per­son node for the time, the val­ue for time, can’t beat them can­not, espe­cial­ly with big­ger groups. Now. You don’t get the fun. You don’t get the con­ver­sa­tions over cock­tails or you know, at our team retreat in Whistler, we had a Jen­ga chal­lenge between two dif­fer­ent we broke up into two teams. One game of Jen­ga was Like an hour and a half. And believe it or not, we actu­al­ly we believe that might have been one of the rea­sons we got a noise com­plaint for where we were. Because we’re hav­ing lit­er­al­ly an hour and a half one game of Jen­ga, but you get 10, hyper com­pet­i­tive peo­ple. And you don’t get to do that you don’t get to have an in per­son, you know, one of those big Jen­ga games, you don’t get to do that. You know, in per­son, you can’t, you know, do a bunch of oth­er fun things, which builds mem­o­ries and cre­ates a lot of fun. So even if you’re vir­tu­al, how do you keep the cul­ture and fun alive in a com­pa­ny, it’s not hard, we do a lot of things. Like, we have fun teams on most of our meet­ings, but they do ener­giz­ers on the breaks. It can be triv­ia, dance com­pe­ti­tions, like you name it exer­cis­es, we have key ques­tions, jokes, we have so many dif­fer­ent, it’s 90 sec­onds. But it is bring­ing some fun and ener­gy to a meet­ing that’s you know, you’re star­ing at a cam­era the whole time. So there’s tons of things you can do. It’s just eas­i­ly neglect­ed. And you know, and fun. And laugh­ter is the best anal­gesic, there is anal­gesic being some­thing that takes away pain. Laugh­ter fun is insanely

Brad Giles 31:11

pow­er­ful. And some­times there are peo­ple who are more fun, or let’s say, fun scenes with­in an orga­ni­za­tion, they’re just fun peo­ple. And so let­ting them thrive, let­ting them you know, take charge of some of these things can make a big dif­fer­ence. Because they, you know, they love doing it. They and you know, they’re there. They’re the fun that they cre­ate, through some of these things can res­onate through oth­er peo­ple and through oth­er teams.

Kevin Lawrence 31:38

Yep, absolute­ly. So it’s not right, it’s not rock­et sci­ence again, but it makes a dif­fer­ence. So let’s kind of run through our list. So remem­ber­ing that there’s a lot of expense to los­ing key peo­ple. And that real­ly, you got to put the same ener­gy into retain­ing your best clients as you do your best peo­ple. And you can do that by deeply know­ing your peo­ple like real­ly con­nect­ing with them and know­ing what’s going on in their world and their work. Stay inter­views to actu­al­ly under­stand where they’re at, and what needs to hap­pen for them to want to stay. The out­put that often might be num­ber for a career path, where, where you make sure that they’re crys­tal clear, and it’s in writ­ing, because some peo­ple can’t see it oth­er­wise, where they’re gonna go, Brad, you want to take the next cou­ple there,

Brad Giles 32:22

sure. And then remov­ing the frus­tra­tions for them. Some­times the frus­tra­tions can be if the effec­tive­ness or effi­cien­cy in your busi­ness mak­ing that improves sig­nif­i­cant­ly. So get­ting rid of those frus­tra­tions, that could be enough to help impact your reten­tion rate, then think­ing about the ambas­sador role, so your role is a leader, either the CEO or a leader of a depart­ment. And that Ambas­sador role being the ambas­sador. So as we men­tioned, we’d spo­ken about this role in Episode 66. But what we’re talk­ing about here rel­a­tive to this is reset­ting and reselling the vision ensur­ing that peo­ple are proud of their team, their man­ag­er, their prod­uct and their com­pa­ny, so that they’re able to, to expe­ri­ence that pride over­all and not let that get in the way. And then of course, the last one, keep­ing the cul­ture and the fun alive with­in the orga­ni­za­tion try­ing to make sure that it’s an active part of what you do find at work or hav­ing you know, fun friends at work can make a huge difference.

Kevin Lawrence 33:31

It does. Excel­lent good chat about reten­tion. We know we love our peo­ple, we say they’re our biggest asset and let’s just make sure we treat them that way. All right, well, thanks for lis­ten­ing. This has been the growth whis­pers pod­cast with Brad Giles and myself Kevin Lawrence. By the way, if you haven’t sub­scribed, go sub­scribe wher­ev­er you lis­ten to your pod­casts. For the video ver­sion, go to YouTube and search the growth whis­pers and for Brad evo­lu­tion part​ners​.com​.au and for myself and my firm Lawrence and co​.com. Have an awe­some week.


Lawrence & Co’s work focuses on sustainable and enhanced growth for you and your business. Our diverse and experienced group of advisors can help your leaders and executive teams stay competitive through the use of various learning tools including workshops, webinars, executive retreats, or one-to-one coaching.

We help high-achieving leaders to have it all – a great business and a rewarding life. Contact us for simple and impactful advice. No BS. No fluff.